[Sugar-devel] On Sugar 0.84 - status of the "Chat/collab leader" issue...

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Fri Nov 6 08:02:30 EST 2009

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 13:16, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:54 PM, David Van Assche <dvanassche at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> moving to mission control 5 and letting go of the admittedly
>>> antiquated sugar presence now
> ...
>> If you play with a major component replacement
>>  - test it for scalability & stability over wifi before doing a lot of
>> integration work
> It's worth noting that moving from the Sugar Presence Service to Mission
> Control 5 would not alter our network protocols.  This is purely a change
> in how the client software is organized.  Neither regression nor
> improvement in wireless network performance should occur.

Was about to say this, the work means making sugar activities' code
more similar to GNOME apps, while also removing a daemon. This could
have some effect on how the network is used, but chances are it won't.

As a first step in removing the PS, I think we should try to implement
the python presence API with MC5 instead of PS. Then we can either
drop the PS or make it a compatibility shim with MC5 while activities
such as eToys make the move.

We can also take the chance to develop a better API if there's need for it.

But in any case, we need to do some exploration now before we can
discuss it in detail.



«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list