No subject

0.86 already.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Personally I&#39;m not keen on it either. I pretty well always skip past it=
 myself and have learnt to click Stop and tap return. But, being neither qu=
alified on the pedagogical needs, nor having seen actual learners of out ta=
rget age, I didn&#39;t want to rush forward and +1 Simon&#39;s proposal.<br=
>

<br>
The main goal as I remember was to try and combat the slew of un-named Jour=
nal entries, but a good chunk of this was likely due to the Home favourite =
view always starting new activity instances. Now that it resumes by default=
, the Journal &#39;spam&#39; has been cut down quite significantly (for me)=
.<br>

<br>
Perhaps we drop this dialogue and then seriously take another look at impro=
ving the names automatically generated for new activity entries?<br></block=
quote><div><br></div><div>Yes, that sounds like a very reasonable way to pr=
oceed!</div>
<div><br></div><div>One=A0suggestion=A0for=A0write&#39;s=A0journal=A0entrie=
s=A0for example=A0would=A0be=A0to=A0use=A0the=A0first=A0few=A0words=A0of=A0=
the=A0document=A0as=A0a=A0suggested=A0entry=A0name=A0(similarly=A0to=A0what=
=A0Microsoft&#39;s=A0Word=A0does).</div><div><br></div>
<div>Christoph</div></div>-- <br>Christoph Derndorfer<br>co-editor, olpcnew=
s<br>url: <a href=3D"http://www.olpcnews.com">www.olpcnews.com</a><br>e-mai=
l: <a href=3D"mailto:christoph at olpcnews.com">christoph at olpcnews.com</a><br>


--0016e64bd5bcf79a5c0472a4a1c1--