[Sugar-devel] Sound levels and pulseaudio fallout
pgf at laptop.org
pgf at laptop.org
Wed May 20 15:34:07 EDT 2009
martin wrote:
> (written as part of the brussels test session)
>
> One thing consistent across the machines we're testing with Soas is
> that many (most?) of them get very low sound levels. This is an issue
> with Fedora and Pulseaudio.
>
> The fedora devel list is aflame with discussion about this, and it
> appears that -- beyond the flaming -- the problem is real, and not
> easy to solve (meaning it won't be solved in F11). There's an
> excellent article on the topic @ http://lwn.net/Articles/330684/
>
> It looks like Fedora (for this release) will recommend people to use
> alsamixer (and a revived oldstyle gnome-mixer) as a workaround. I'm
> not sure if there's a scripted way to get the "other" channels pumped
> up to their max levels properly -- and if you do it blindly, it seems
> that you might overshoot the mark and saturate.
>
> Thought I'd flag it as it's quite likely to hit many Soas users. (On
> known hw such as the XO it's easier to rig it).
low-end hardware like the XO has no business running pulse. last
i looked, simply playing an uncompressed audio stream
(admittedly, it was probably sourced remotely, but that's not
uncommon) caused pulse to consume about 10% of a 1.6Ghz atom.
now, it's somewhat possible that my system was misconfigured --
perhaps someone should double check me on this.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list