[Sugar-devel] More concrete design for easily installable device extensions?

[Gabriel Eirea]

Excuse me if I jump into this discussion. There is a problem here in
Uruguay related to this issue. Given the security system implemented
by Ceibal, users don't have root access. This makes it very difficult
to include changes in Sugar, like the clock described in the parent
post.

Would it be possible to devise an extension architecture that would
allow to install extensions without root access? This would be very
helpful for us.

Thank you,

Gabriel

> 2009/5/11 Michael Stone <michael at laptop.org>:
>> Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>>> a) this could be a good moment to get the infrastructure on
>>> activities.sugarlabs.org for device extensions up - or at least to think
>>> about how we can realize that...
>>
>> Simon,
>>
>> Could you please offer a more concrete description of the use cases and design
>> that you have in mind so that those who wish to may reflect on its interaction
>> with Sugar's existing (0.84) and previous (0.82) security models and
>> situations?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>