[Sugar-devel] Sugar on various distros
dr at jones.dk
Tue Mar 24 17:08:24 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:32:55PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:07:04PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> What workarounds?
> Using Python 2.5 instead of Python 2.6 in Ubuntu Jaunty by changing
> the symlink /usr/bin/python (*), using python-gobject from sid as the
> one in squeeze is too old. The new one has passed the 10 day
> incubation period, but not been promoted yet.
>> Is it registered at the respective bug trackers?
> The respective bugs are in the bug trackers, the workarounds not.
I realize now that you are talking about jhbuild, not packaged Sugar.
Then I agree that it makes little sense to track workarounds (at the
distro side - it might make sense to track upstream how to make the
non-packaged tool work in various odd/broken environments).
>>> Native packages for Ubuntu/Debian are still stuck at 0.82.
> Just realized this sounds more negative than it was meant. Your work
> on packaging improvements is quite appreciated.
I was not offended, but thanks the the reassuring anyway :-)
> (*) Really bad hack, will break updates of unrelated packages in very
> interesting ways.
I must admit that I have little sympathy for Ubuntu when it breaks due
to "running ahead" of Debian. As I consider to be the case here.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel