[Sugar-devel] [Gsoc] SWF Sugar
Bryan Berry
bryan at olenepal.org
Tue Mar 24 08:24:07 EDT 2009
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 20:16 +0800, KSChan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> Thx Jameson for clarifying ^^ I further get a few questions in mind.
>
>
> 1. question on Karma...
> I'm not quite familiar with webkit (although I always use it ^^") Does
> webkit already support the html 5 draft ?
> And, can someone clarify for me that ... Is the project Karma aims to
> develop a run-time environment so that it can renders html5 + js
> created activity (which does not start a browser activity) on top of
> sugar?
Webkit supports much of html5, certainly the parts we care about most
which are embedding animation and audio w/out flash.
Karma doesn't aim to develop a new run-time but use an existing run-time
like Titanium or just regular firefox and extend that run-time to take
advantage of Sugar's special features, particularly collaboration.
> 2. question on Imporved Read Activity...
> After reading the message
> on http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-March/012821.html, is it aims to modify the current Read activity so that it merge the functions of Read and ReadEText?? Or, even fork a new "Read" so that it identifies when to use Read engine and when to use ReadEText.
>
>
> 3. question on Improved Imageviewer...
> Does current Sugar implementation allows BT like peer2peer
> communication? Does the image sharing only does a point2point file
> transfer?
>
>
> Many thanks =]
>
>
> kschan.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Jameson Quinn
> <jameson.quinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Questions like that are best sent to sugar-devel, this list is
> just for gsoc administrative/operational questions.
>
> To answer: the idea is to make hooks so you can save to
> journal, do collaboration, and easily set up a sugar-like UI,
> from inside Flash; and to make a demo activity which shows off
> these hooks by packaging an SWF as a sugar activity. However,
> discussion on sugar-devel has shown that people think that the
> AJAX Sugar/ Karma idea has a bigger bang for the buck, for
> various reasons. We'd still consider a good SWF Sugar
> application, but if it's the same to you we'd prefer the same
> for AJAX (using titanium, I guess).
>
> Jameson
>
> 2009/3/23 KSChan <mr.kschan at gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm a undergrad from hong kong, china. In these few
> weeks, I'm keeping my eyes on gsoc and at the same
> time assisting the simplified chinese translation work
> for olpc-asia. The translation work is almost done and
> thus it is the time for me to spend effort on sugar^^.
>
>
> I would like to know more about a brainstorming idea
> on
> SWF_Sugar http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/ProjectIdeas#SWF_Sugar. Is it aiming at translating .swf into sugar activity? Or, building an activity to support .swf? Or, even compiling .as into sugar activity??
>
>
> Can anyone clarify for me ^^?
>
>
> kschan.
>
>
> --
> I, have a dream. I want to make my dream come true.
> Anyway, OLPC Rocks!
>
> http://mr.kschan.googlepages.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GSoC mailing list
> GSoC at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/gsoc
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> I, have a dream. I want to make my dream come true. Anyway, OLPC
> Rocks!
>
> http://mr.kschan.googlepages.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list