[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Bugs] #925 HIGH: Scratch is not sugarized

[dthornburg at aol.com]

 I did the Linux hack for Scratch a long time ago and lack the chops to make it pretty.? Also, the new version has features like web-cam capture.? I think the Scratch team is working on a decent Linux version now.? Check with them.

Warm regards,

David Thornburg


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Caroline Meeks <caroline at solutiongrove.com>
To: Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com>
Cc: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Bugs] #925 HIGH: Scratch is not sugarized












On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:



On 3 Jun 2009, at 13:53, Caroline Meeks wrote:





Hi,



Should this bug really get closed or is there some other state it could be in?






I'd say a trac ticket must have a real named owner to be of any use.






Sugarizing Scratch is clearly a legitimate feature request.






It's more an onerous task, than a feature request ;-) There nothing coders (and you need to find a willing coder) hate more than having to poke around someone else's code to make it work right...



I have faith someone will do it. :)? Someone did a port I think a year before the offical Linux version was released.? Its a popular tool, and although I know there are complications, I hope and believe someone will find it a worthwhile task. 










I'm not saying sdz should do it this week, but if someone came along and wanted to do something this task should definitely be on the list of tasks a Sugar volunteer could do.



Where do we keep track of requests like Sugarizing Scratch?






You could add it to the bottom of this Activity Team page:



 ? ? ? ?http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/TODO


Done. 

Thanks







Regards,

--Gary









---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: SugarLabs Bugs <bugtracker-noreply at sugarlabs.org>

Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:39 AM

Subject: Re: [Bugs] #925 HIGH: Scratch is not sugarized

To:

Cc: bugs at lists.sugarlabs.org





#925: Scratch is not sugarized

----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

 ? Reporter: ?davidjim ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? ? ?Owner: ?sdz

 ? ? ? Type: ?defect ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? ? Status: ?closed

 ? Priority: ?High ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ?Milestone: ?Unspecified by Release Team

 ?Component: ?SoaS ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? ?Version:

 ? Severity: ?Major ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ? Resolution: ?notsugar

 ? Keywords: ?scratch sugarized ?| ? Distribution: ?SoaS

Status_field: ?New ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|

----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Changes (by erikos):



?* status: ?new => closed

?* version: ?0.84.x =>

?* resolution: ?=> notsugar

?* milestone: ?0.84 => Unspecified by Release Team





Comment:



?Scratch is not included in a build. This is not a Soas bug. Of course it

?would be nice to have it better integrated. Please check with the upstream

?maintainers.



--

Ticket URL: <http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/925#comment:1>

Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/>

Sugar Labs bug tracking system

_______________________________________________

Bugs mailing list

Bugs at lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/bugs







-- 

Caroline Meeks

Solution Grove

Caroline at SolutionGrove.com



617-500-3488 - Office

505-213-3268 - Fax



_______________________________________________

Sugar-devel mailing list

Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel










-- 
Caroline Meeks
Solution Grove
Caroline at SolutionGrove.com

617-500-3488 - Office
505-213-3268 - Fax



 





_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090608/4137ad24/attachment-0001.htm