[Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard<dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>Please note that the journal is not an independent module since 0.84, 
>>>so only if you are packaging 0.82 you should worry about it (and go 
>>>to OLPC machines for tarballs etc.).
>>
>> Ah, that explains why such a core part is not "up-to-date".
>>
>> Perhaps you should add an end-of-life note, detailing whether it is 
>> harmless or not to have the old activity installed on newer Sugar, at 
>> these places:
>>
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal/repos/mainline
>
>It's already in http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal

Ah, ok.


>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Journal
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Application_Stack
>>
>> (and possibly more - I keep loosing track of all the "homepages" of 
>> Sugar pieces)
>>
>> ...or for the places that is inappropriate to display historical 
>> info, it might make sense to _remove_ mentioning Journal instead.
>
>Well the journal exist, it's just that it's incorporated in the shell 
>module instead of living in its own module. I guess this is only of 
>concern to packagers, not to regular users?

Yeah, I guess you are right.  I just felt that more places than 
Gitorious targeted packagers, but maybe not.

At least I got the message now. :-D


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkopC4QACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiIagCdGlH3WWvzrxY1tZFCvm/jKQqD
rnoAnju+UkYBjJsJoL80xRN+Z6FZ+KQg
=TT+e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----