[Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

Santiago Ruano Rincón santiago at unicauca.edu.co
Sun Jul 19 08:34:29 EDT 2009


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:48:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...
> >
> >I'm looking at your packages, but the only change I found is in
> >changelog, or I am wrong?
> >
> >Anyway, I've added DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += nostrip and yeah, it seems to
> >work. I'll upload it to debian.
> 
> Using nostrip violates Debian Policy!
> 

Upps!! You're right. I wonder if lintian should warn this. Reverting...

> What's even stranger is that I - in the train here to Spain - 
> experienced that a simple recompile also works!
> 
> What was your build environment for that last release?  Do you use 
> pbuilder or similar virgin-like environment?

Yes, I use pbuilder.

> 
> Package dependencies (for the binary package, not build-dependencies) 
> also look odd - they are _newer_ for that old build than when 
> recompiling against up-to-date Sid.
> 
> 
> Please test with simple recompile (standard stripping!) and consider 
> rereleasing!
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>   - Jonas
> 

Best regards,

Santiago
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090719/46b53ee8/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list