[Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian
Santiago Ruano Rincón
santiago at unicauca.edu.co
Sun Jul 19 08:34:29 EDT 2009
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:48:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...
> >
> >I'm looking at your packages, but the only change I found is in
> >changelog, or I am wrong?
> >
> >Anyway, I've added DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += nostrip and yeah, it seems to
> >work. I'll upload it to debian.
>
> Using nostrip violates Debian Policy!
>
Upps!! You're right. I wonder if lintian should warn this. Reverting...
> What's even stranger is that I - in the train here to Spain -
> experienced that a simple recompile also works!
>
> What was your build environment for that last release? Do you use
> pbuilder or similar virgin-like environment?
Yes, I use pbuilder.
>
> Package dependencies (for the binary package, not build-dependencies)
> also look odd - they are _newer_ for that old build than when
> recompiling against up-to-date Sid.
>
>
> Please test with simple recompile (standard stripping!) and consider
> rereleasing!
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> - Jonas
>
Best regards,
Santiago
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090719/46b53ee8/attachment.pgp
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list