[Sugar-devel] sugar on Debian : sugar-web-activity conflict
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Tue Jul 14 09:03:51 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:44:28PM +0200, s.boutayeb at free.fr wrote:
>Selon Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>:
>> >3/ Tried to install sugar-web-activity
>> >The package conflicts with:
>> >- python-hulahop (unsatisfied dependency)
>> >- python-xpcom (unsatisfied dependency)
>>
>> I am not familiar with gnewsense, but this might be a too new Browse
>> that requires 0.84 Sugar.
>>
>> If using 0.82 then please try using Debian Lenny.
>
>Did it (debian/lenny/mipsel):
>- python-hulahop 0.4.8~dfsg-3 is required
>- python-xpcom 1.9.0.11-0lenny is required
>
>One dependency-resolution alternative proposed by aptitude is to
>uninstall gnome ;-)
Are you telling me that a plain vanilla Debian Lenny does not allow you
to install GNOME and Sugar concurrently?
Or just that some mixture of Debian and non-Debian happen to conflict
with each other in complex ways that might be solveable but aptitude
assume that you prefer explicitly installed non-Debian packages over
GNOME?
>On another pc (debian/squeeze/i386), the installation of
>sugar-web-activity (108-2) succeeded after installing python-hulahop
>0.4.9-1, that was required.
It succeeds when fulfilling the dependencies of the package? Then all
is good.
Or are you telling me that there was a problem with that dependency?
Kind regards, and thanks for your help,
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=+iAd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list