[Sugar-devel] squeak in debian

Luke Faraone luke at laptop.org
Tue Jan 27 10:09:28 EST 2009


On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:51, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:48:20AM +1800, David Farning wrote:
>>> Is it squeak and etoys that we are missing from debian?
>>>
>>> They now seem to be available in lenny.
>>>
>>> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/etoys
>>> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/squeak-vm
>>
>> From a Sugar point of view those are "libraries" (so is not even  
>> listed
>> as part of "Sucrose").
>>
>> The actual sugarized wrapper for Etoys is not yet packaged.
>>
>> Another library which is not yet packaged for Debian is libabiword.
>>
>> From a Debian point of view, the following packaged are missing:
>
> What areas would you like outside help on?
>
>> libabiword-dev
>
> I have talked with with the debain build team.  They agreed to build
> abiword as a lib... for the next release.  Luke followed up with
> issues report on debian bug tracker.  What next?
>
>> sugar-etoys-activity
>
> Should I continue pushing for inclusion of etoys into main?  In
> theory, all of the issues are resolved.  Should I wait until after the
> release to bring up the issue?
>
>> sugar-write-activity

Depends on lib- and py- abiword.

>> sugar-terminal-activity
>
> ??
>
>> sugar-log-activity
>
> ??

Both just need packaging. I'll probaby be able to handle one or two,  
and will file the ITPs.

> Things are not yet perfect. But, we are in a _much_ better position
> then we were this time last release!
>

Yes, sugar not even being in Debian at all :)

-lf

> david
>>
>> - Jonas
>>
>>
>>
>>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list