[Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 06:24:48PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
>Hi,
>
>   >> I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of 
>   >> dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference 
>   >> between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to 
>   >> the wiki, download an activity, and use it, or not being able to.
>
>   > It's also the difference between following the license terms and 
>   > not.
>
>Not in the case we're discussing; Box2D and pyBox2D are not licensed 
>under the GPL.  While the complaint in general is reasonable, please 
>don't accuse people of breaching software licenses until they actually 
>do so.

I did not accuse of licensing breach, and I do not interpret Luke as 
doing so either.

What I did was mention _some_ of the problems _generally_ tied to 
shipping .xo packages stuffed with binary chunks.


  - Jonas

P.S.

And a moment ago I succeeded compiling Box2d on amd64 using GCC 4.3.2. 
Still some way to go to have it properly compiled, but a good step in 
the right direction.

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

   [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl2Y1QACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgYTACgict1OtTCNyY5JdLm3HPpQt1B
FzMAnje7qhRpGNe7f2V88dnQOi5Kd4Wi
=VYVe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----