[Sugar-devel] Future of Rainbow + Sugar?
pgf at laptop.org
pgf at laptop.org
Tue Feb 24 13:30:27 EST 2009
bert wrote:
> On 24.02.2009, at 19:09, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
...
> > Asking for better documentation doesn't imply that the facility is
> > new. It recognizes that development has reached a local minimum in
> > an important component that is not well understood by many. My post
> > was a request to the most knowledgeable person, Michael to do the
> > service of taking the time to write a document that clearly lays out
> >
> > . the purpose (not in security speak but in terms of the benefits
> > it brings to end users),
for my part, i've always felt that it's this first point of
carol's that's been missing from the docs. the functional
overview is very important: as a developer, you're asking me to
implement a bunch of new API functionality simply to make a
simple program (which may already be working well in most other unix
environments) functional. i'd like to be sold on the concept
first, before having to do a bunch of work for no (apparent) benefit
to me or my program.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list