[Sugar-devel] Future of Rainbow + Sugar?
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Tue Feb 24 13:23:04 EST 2009
On 24.02.2009, at 19:09, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
> Bert, Are you satisfied with the number of activity developers?
> Are you satisfied with the number of developers within the
> deployments? Have you noticed the periodic questions on the
> developer-oriented lists about Rainbow security and whether it is
> causing mysterious symptoms? I'm not, and I have.
I am virtually certain that Rainbow is not the major obstacle to
getting more activity developers.
> Asking for better documentation doesn't imply that the facility is
> new. It recognizes that development has reached a local minimum in
> an important component that is not well understood by many. My post
> was a request to the most knowledgeable person, Michael to do the
> service of taking the time to write a document that clearly lays out
>
> . the purpose (not in security speak but in terms of the benefits
> it brings to end users),
>
> . the relevance of APIs versus packaging elements versus choices by
> the sugar shell/infrastructure developers,
>
> . things that the activity developers can and can't do (given that
> I, at least, hope that new developers will participate, who have
> preconceptions from other environments),
>
> Things that are hoped for in future development (well delimited from
> things that are there now.)
>
> Good documentation is hard, and wiki pages are only good
> documentation if the wiki is maintained with great discipline (which
> I fear is not the case at w.l.o). But for a subtle and complex
> feature such as Rainbow, good documentation would be a motivator for
> use both within and outside the sugar community.
Agreed. However, what activity authors need to know about rainbow is
documented, and it really is not much. For example, here
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Low-level_Activity_API#Security
This is not even a full page, and if activity authors use the Python
Sugar toolkit they can worry even less about this.
- Bert -
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list