[Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Thu Feb 19 04:16:45 EST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:24:38PM -0500, Mick Weiss wrote:
>We do need to take into consideration that not every language has 
>"activities", some have "actividades" or "Aktivitäten" etc.
>Is this something that we can support through CNAMEs? The config file 
>may have some odd things w/ this -- but we might be able to use super 
>globals ($_SERVER) - or? Nothing should really be hard coded anyhow.

I strongly recommend using redirects instead of aliasing for exact same 
content. Preferably defined in Apache rather than PHP or similar, so 
that it is most elegantly done (Apache redirects are declared both in 
http header and as html "page", so the actual redirecting happens faster 
in modern browsers).

Alternatively, localized content could be provided - but that's way more 
work.


>Also, I have one other idea... how about someone asks a 6 yr old what 
>they would expect it to be called. They should have 3 votes ;)

You'd need to more clearly define "it" first, I guess ;-)

To me, at least, favoring "activities" over "addons" is tied to my 
belief of what it actually makes sense to use it for. Asking an outsider 
about a name "out of the blue" would make her/him try imagine on their 
own what kind of place "it" would actually become.


  - Jonas


- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmdI30ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhvEgCeMw9hBEa/QbTTgKxHx19Ykzm9
moQAn1viYYZXBOVM+2dVzfKmAutKTdm3
=nHAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list