[Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities
dr at jones.dk
Thu Feb 19 04:06:54 EST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:26:42PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> > activities.sugarlabs.org
>+1 to activities here. Makes it clear and straightforward that it's
>the place to get Sugar activities, which is what it's for.
>Since an argument against it is that we want the site to host more than
>activities, could someone enumerate what sort of things we can imagine
>putting there that shouldn't go under the activities heading?
I believe this included an interest in distributing libraries.
I would favor a separation between the place to get "first class
activities" and the place to mess up the system with external built
libraries and other dirty hacks.
Simple way to get simple (i.e. reliable!) activities is the main target
of this service, right? Then I'd go for "activities.sugarlabs.org!
It _might_ make sense to provide a parallel service for 2nd class
activities and their libraries. But really I think that is too complex
to handle reliably anyway, so would be better to leave to simple web
pages as now (at least until .xo format grows into handling
versioned "features" as I proposed in a separate mail).
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel