[Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

[Greg Dekoenigsberg]

+1 to activities.sl.o.

Seems like a pretty strong vote.  :)

--g

--
Got an XO that you're not using?  Loan it to a needy developer!
   [[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Eben Eliason wrote:

> +1 for activities from me, as well.
>
> "Addons" makes it sound like a plugin system, which activities are
> not.  Activities are distinct self contained bundles for a variety of
> purposes, and I think embracing the term "activities" will make it
> much easier for anyone even somewhat new to Sugar to make sense of
> things.
>
> - Eben
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote:
>>
>>> There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
>>>
>>> addons.sugarlabs.org
>>> or
>>> activities.sugarlabs.org
>>
>> +1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest
>> 'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with vague
>> references to firefox tech (which I do occasionally use when a site
>> complains about Safari) but that will have no direct meaning for
>> majority of Sugar users.
>>
>>> Which do you prefer?  I like activities.sl.o better but it means more
>>> work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash.
>>>
>>> david
>>>
>>> (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>