[Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities

[Eben Eliason]

+1 for activities from me, as well.

"Addons" makes it sound like a plugin system, which activities are
not.  Activities are distinct self contained bundles for a variety of
purposes, and I think embracing the term "activities" will make it
much easier for anyone even somewhat new to Sugar to make sense of
things.

- Eben

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote:
>
>> There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
>>
>> addons.sugarlabs.org
>> or
>> activities.sugarlabs.org
>
> +1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest
> 'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with vague
> references to firefox tech (which I do occasionally use when a site
> complains about Safari) but that will have no direct meaning for
> majority of Sugar users.
>
>> Which do you prefer?  I like activities.sl.o better but it means more
>> work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash.
>>
>> david
>>
>> (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>