[Sugar-devel] What should we call it? Addons of Activities
Gary C Martin
gary at garycmartin.com
Wed Feb 18 18:22:59 EST 2009
On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote:
> There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
+1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest
'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with vague
references to firefox tech (which I do occasionally use when a site
complains about Safari) but that will have no direct meaning for
majority of Sugar users.
> Which do you prefer? I like activities.sl.o better but it means more
> work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash.
> (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes)
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel