[Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

[David Farning]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push
> will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git?
>
> Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment
> supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of
> the two mentioned so far in this thread, or a dedicated
> project-hosting service elsewhere), I would focus on creating good
> mirrors, rather than on picking any particular single host.  There is
> currently still risk of losing people's work.

While you wait for a best case scenario.... We will continue to move
forward one step at a time.

david

> SJ
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luke Faraone <luke at faraone.cc> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I like that part.  Are there criteria for removing someone's project
>>> if it's deemed inappropriate?
>>
>> Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL
>> infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll discuss it on the
>> sugar-devel or IAEP mailing list.
>>
>> --
>> Luke Faraone
>> http://luke.faraone.cc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>