[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Wed Feb 11 14:56:11 EST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:26:28PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
>On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
>> 1) You consider packaging Pippy and sugar-base my way equally
>> complex.
>>
>> 2) Failure to understand my way of sugar-base packaging is your
>> reason for not packaging *anything* in *any* way through Debian.
>>
>> Or did I miss something?
>
>Yes, I'm saying the package maintinence operations under
>git-buildpackage are more or less the same. Obviously, you need to
>make changes to the buildfile, etc.
>
>I also fail to see the use of using git-buildpackage; we aren't going
>to make use of upstream git snapshots and are almost always going to
>be using an upstream tarball. Finally, git versioning and merging is
>of little use since we are using CDBS' patchsystem.
No need to get into details of what exactly is flawed with my packaging
style, or how you would do things differently:
1) I can continue to do things my way
2) You can continue being ignorant of Debian not mandating a specific
packaging style.
3) Others are still free to follow my recommendation: Package through
Debian, not directly at their pet derived distribution, to avoid
duplicated work.
Thanks for your time, and interest in working together.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmTLVoACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjSqQCdGy0BqjqcBJ45mwwCNm5OC2oP
xCoAoJsbTVSxFbW25Xw38WaZyyX/q6R0
=9rvB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list