[Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

[Benjamin M. Schwartz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Still, the Debian packaging currently takes no special care for eventual 
> special Sugar needs. If olpcsound is only about leaving out CPU-heavy 
> stuff it should be a problem only for XO hardware (and similar low-end 
> hardware).

Debian targets lots of low-end hardware.

Also, I think there's a bit of confusion here.  Does olpcsound do anything
/differently/ from csound, or does it simply /leave out/ certain
capabilities?  If the latter, then it seems the question is more about
saving disk space than CPU time.  (Both are valuable, of course.)

Either way, it seems like some metapackaging is in order, so that each
dependency can choose to depend on one or either.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmS/F4ACgkQUJT6e6HFtqQpeQCfTR2RSanIyYZLeneaAi53VxW5
E2EAnjf0+eds5npGxadKW/BCrtxuT+X8
=v2Y+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----