[Sugar-devel] Zero-calorie bundles?
alsroot at member.fsf.org
Sat Dec 12 20:55:18 EST 2009
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:
> > I've coded initial implementation for "standalone" 0install mode,
> > w/o any support from shell. So, activity could bundle saccharin module
> > to .xo and maybe 0install pure python library as well(otherwise system
> > should have already installed zeroinstall-injector package, it could be
> > any version - saccharin will update it from the web on the first start).
> Sounds like a fantastic development. I personally won't be able to
> review/test/use for a while but as Wade mentions, not needing explicit
> support from Sugar is a great, and avoids a ton of bootstrapping
BTW that's driving me to second evolution of Unified Objects -> Journal
Plugins -> and now, just a Shell Integration API, thanks!
I'm going to post corrective message to "[FEATURE] Journal Plugins"
More information about the Sugar-devel