[Sugar-devel] 0.84 maintenance
Gary C Martin
gary at garycmartin.com
Sun Dec 6 18:20:53 EST 2009
On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/12/1 Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org>:
>> Also on this topic - we will certainly run into issues where activities
>> themselves progress beyond the Sugar-0.84 platform; if activity authors
>> could work to minimize these cases (i.e. keep backwards compatibility,
>> remain responsive to bugs) it would help us avoid a huge headache, and
>> will help your activities spread to various corners of the globe.
> I think this is a current policy of the activity team?
The word policy seems a little official, but yes, I'd certainly not want one of the activities I help maintain to intentionally break under 0.84 (or 0.82 for that matter).
More information about the Sugar-devel