[Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts
Art Hunkins
abhunkin at uncg.edu
Tue Aug 18 13:06:05 EDT 2009
I'm thoroughly confused and frustrated.
My POV: I'm authoring an Activity *today*. I'd like it to look good on all
XO and (other) Sugar on a Stick screens (monitors) *today*. My activity is
entirely text-based, is a single fixed screen, and fills that screen. It is
also in English, and I think it unlikely to translate to other languages.
Please excuse me: I'm not a Suger developer, nor a Linux guru; I'm just
struggling with a couple of python scripts.
I am lukewarm at best to having a user option in Control Panel to make font
size smaller or larger. (Please count me as a -1 for this suggestion.) For
*my* activity, this would only allow kids to make text too small to read, or
possibly overflow the screen - ruining my considerable effort to achieve
maximum readability. OTOH, hardly any child will try this; certainly no
author should *expect* a 6-year-old to have to change font size to make
their activity "readable." So, this issue matters rather little to me.
I write my activities on the XO-1, *for* the XO. I hope there is no change
of default font or font size for the XO series. If there *is* a change, my
activity won't look right, nor, I suspect, would other activities with
substantial text (especially fixed screen - no scrolling). I plan to make
sure my screens stay the way I want, by specifying font size (thus hopefully
overriding any change in system default).
Basically, I strongly feel that *authors* - not users, not the system
(including upstream), nor even deployments - should determine their basic
screen layouts. "One size" certainly does *not* fit all; and any/all
defaults should be overridable by authors in their scripts. It should be the
*author's* responsibility to make their activities look right on various
monitors.
As I see it, as far as text is concerned, the only real tool the author has
is font size. And the same font size does not fill up the screen for both
XO-1 and a larger SoaS monitor. (And I *want* it to fill both screens.) So I
need to (and can) determine which kind of screen I'm dealing with (either
XO, non-XO 4:3 or non-XO 16:9) and specify font size per screen type.
Again I ask: given that *I* want to control display characteristics, should
the above strategy work, and be compatible with the changes in F11 fonts
being considered? Or is there a better way (*now*)? I've put in over a year
of my life already on this project, and would like to get it out the door
sometime soon. (Can you tell I'm frustrated?!)
Art Hunkins
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Drake" <dsd at laptop.org>
To: "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
Cc: "Art Hunkins" <abhunkin at uncg.edu>; <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>;
<fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] F11 for XO1 - Fonts
2009/8/18 Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>:
> IOWs, I pine for this gtk+ v3 patch
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546711
>
> which was introduced with a very insightful discussion thread
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-August/msg00044.html
This was brought up earlier in the discussion. Yes, it's hopefully the
light at the end of the tunnel.
> see specially
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-August/msg00068.html
>
> Hmmm. You guys are papering over this gtk shortcoming -- which is
> bound to be confusing. Here's a candle for GTK+v3
Feel free to suggest another option that can be implemented today.
I feel that my proposal is technically sound given what we have right
now, given its simplicity. Don't mess with DPI, just let deployers
select font sizes that look good on their target systems, and give the
users 2 nice simple buttons: get bigger, get smaller. It's simple and
won't eat much developer time. It will allow things to look ok on XO
and other platforms as long as there is someone who can select a good
default base font size.
It also fits nicely into what would come with GTK+3 since you'd just
swap the backend control from "font size" to "scale factor" (or
whatever equivalent knob comes out of all those discussions). The idea
of deployers being able (and often required) to select a good default
will remain, along with a dead-simple UI for changing it.
It will be also interesting to see what the css/html world comes up
with. I've seen a few discussions recently, they too are challenged by
being a platform that's spreading to vastly different displays.
Daniel
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list