[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-110

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 20:38, Sayamindu Dasgupta<sayamindu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I think the version jump is intentional to allow for intermediate
> stable releases targetted for 0.84 if the need arises. If someone
> finds a critical issue in Browse 103, Simon can always release 104
> with the fix and nothing more.

One day we may be able to agree in a different numbering scheme ;)

Regards,

Tomeu


> -sdg-
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Christoph
> Derndorfer<christoph.derndorfer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Out of curiosity: How did we end up at Browse-110?
>> Maybe I missed something here but wasn't the latest version 102, 103 or
>> something when this issue was last discussed less than 72 hours ago?
>> Slightly confused,
>> Christoph
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> == Source ==
>>>
>>>
>>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-110.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> == News ==
>>> Toolbar redesign
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Derndorfer
>> co-editor, olpcnews
>> url: www.olpcnews.com
>> e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sayamindu Dasgupta
> [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>