[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Proposal of Google Summer of Code

[Jameson Quinn]

Your mistake was that you created a "document" instead of a "proposal" in
google's web app. I have forwarded your message and explained the situation
to google's GSoC administrator to see what we can do. There's nothing else I
can do to help you.

Sincerely,
Jameson

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício <
nathalia.sautchuk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Jameson,
>
> I did understand. I put my proposal in the Google's web app before the
> deadline. But, I checked now and it is not there anymore. I am desperate
> since I put a lot of effort on getting writing my proposal and everybody saw
> it during the last days.
>
> There are someting that could be done? I really want to participate in this
> GSoC and I can't understand why my proposal is not there!!!!
>
> Also, I put my proposal in the documents list inside the GSoC web, which
> you can check in the attached screenshot. It's is a copy of my proposal, and
> it is not modified after the deadline. Could Google consider this copy?
>
> Regards,
>
> Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
> http://febracev.wordpress.com/
>
> Antes de imprimir, pense em sua responsabilidade social e com o MEIO
> AMBIENTE.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Nathalia, I am truly sorry, but since you did not get your application
>> into Google's web app by the deadline, we are unable to consider you for
>> Google Summer of Code. However, we would be happy if you are still
>> interested in doing the project, and could probably assign you an unofficial
>> mentor (I'll have to see how many slots Google assigns us before I can say
>> that definitely though).
>>
>> I tried to make this clear, and it was clearly stated in several places on
>> the mailing list, wiki, and google's site. I am sorry that I did not manage
>> to get this message to you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jameson
>>
>>  2009/4/3 Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício <nathalia.sautchuk at gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for all the feedbacks. It is very important.
>>>
>>> I improve my proposal, if anyone could read it I'm pleased.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
>>> http://febracev.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>> Antes de imprimir, pense em sua responsabilidade social e com o MEIO
>>> AMBIENTE.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Eben Eliason <eben at laptop.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had this idea when I was making the very first mockups of Paint, and
>>>> I think it's a great idea! Check out the mockup: it's the brush with
>>>> the little gear next to it, which I always referred to as the
>>>> "behavior brush".
>>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image:Activity_paint_tools.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The secondary palette for the brush would offer a list of different
>>>> behaviors (which should be object which can be copied, shared,
>>>> installed, etc., ideally). More importantly, the behaviors would be
>>>> defined by simple scripts which took some basic pre-defined parameters
>>>> (or maybe even allowed the creator of the behavior to define new
>>>> parameters, linked to sliders or checkboxes or what have you...not
>>>> sure), offered some predefined ways to size the brush, set colors,
>>>> draw shapes, and make brush strokes, and thus allowed creation of
>>>> behaviors with some simple syntax.
>>>>
>>>> As an example, you could have a "mirror" behavior which read in the
>>>> current coordinates, and then made two marks with the brush mirrored
>>>> across the middle of the canvas. A custom parameter could define which
>>>> axis (or axes) were mirrored. You could have brushes which added
>>>> randomness to the position making squiggly lines; or a brush which set
>>>> the color based on the time to draw rainbow strokes; or a brush that
>>>> worked like an airbrush of star shapes. The possibilities are endless,
>>>> I think.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, as Ben said, focus isn't on activities; but I wanted to chime
>>>> in since I think this is truly a fantastic idea and I'd love to see it
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> Eben
>>>>
>>>> PS. I also had plans to allow behavior shapes, as well:
>>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image:Activity_paint_shapes_polygon.jpg
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
>>>> <nathalia.sautchuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hello everybody,
>>>> >
>>>> > I put my GSoC Proposal here:
>>>> > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2009/Oficina
>>>> >
>>>> > If somebody has a feedback send me an e-mail (personally or in this
>>>> list) or
>>>> > put in the discussion page in wiki.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks a lot...
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício
>>>> > http://febracev.wordpress.com/
>>>> >
>>>> > Antes de imprimir, pense em sua responsabilidade social e com o MEIO
>>>> > AMBIENTE.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090405/ed3daeb5/attachment-0001.htm