[Sugar-devel] GSoC proposal: Speech Synnthesis

chirag jain chiragjain1989 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 12:30:02 EDT 2009


Modified the proposal a lot.

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/speech-synthesis

want some feedback

On 4/1/09, sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org
<sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to
> 	sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	sugar-devel-owner at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sugar-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: [RELEASE] Browse-106 (Gary C Martin)
>    2. Re: [Server-devel] Gadget on XS (David Farning)
>    3. Re: [Bugs] #645 UNSP: make sugarlabs.org the default	page
>       (Christian Marc Schmidt)
>    4. [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0.2212 (Bert Freudenberg)
>    5. Re: [Server-devel] Gadget on XS (Jonas Smedegaard)
>    6. Re: [Server-devel] Gadget on XS (Guillaume Desmottes)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:03:28 +0100
> From: Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-106
> To: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> Cc: sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Message-ID: <98C63B1D-496B-4DAB-94F3-5F93920EF668 at garycmartin.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> On 1 Apr 2009, at 07:16, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Martin Langhoff
>> <martin.langhoff at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Kudos for the release! One note though:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
>>>> * Make sugarlabs.org the default homepage
>>>
>>> Um. This means that Browse out-of-the-box doesn't behave well in
>>> disconnected or XS-driven environments.
>>
>> Going back on the actual trac entry, it seems like it still retains a
>> local page, and that the changelog is misleading. Sorry about the
>> noise.
>>
>> I just hope that it's still a local page, with links that make it
>> useful out-of-the-box for small deployments, like 'Activities' and
>> 'Schoolserver' (hint, hint! ;-) ) as well as Sugarlabs.
>
> I almost put in a link to 'Schools', but should that link to:
>
> 	http://schools.sugarlabs.org/
>
> ...so that folks trying out Sugar don't get a broken link, or:
>
> 	http://schoolserver/
>
> Not sure what the common case would be for this release.
>
> --Gary
>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>> m
>> --
>> martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>> martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>> - ask interesting questions
>> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:18:37 -0500
> From: David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Server-devel] Gadget on XS
> To: Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>
> Cc: server-devel at lists.laptop.org, Sugar-dev
> 	<Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<b6625b990904010818i141e0153s449e37d7fddda440 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
>>>Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 ? 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a ?crit :
>>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
>>>> >The Debian package write logs to /var/log/gadget.log iirc;
>>
>>>> What Debian package? Gadget does not seem to be in Debian Sid. I'd be
>>>> happy to help maintain it officially for Debian if there is already a
>>>> Gadget package floating around unofficially.
>>>
>>>See http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/log/?h=debian
>>
>> Above URL does not clarify if it is in Debian officially.
>>
>> If my questions are too silly to respond to with human words (as opposed
>> to just URLs), then I shall not bother you anymore with them.
>
> Please try to stay polite.
>
> English is not the native language for many of the participants in Sugar
> Labs.
>
> Many times I prefer to send links rather than try to make people
> understand my mangled use of written language.
>
> david
>
>
>>
>> - --
>> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
>> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 ?Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>>
>> ?[x] quote me freely ?[ ] ask before reusing ?[ ] keep private
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAknTfnsACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhvLwCdEYix1/1+eZ8h4pGqF0BMZxv2
>> 9cMAn24cd9imFLI5tLoPf4vHOcA8mWMI
>> =ABKF
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:27:02 -0400
> From: Christian Marc Schmidt <christianmarc at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Bugs] #645 UNSP: make sugarlabs.org the
> 	default	page
> To: Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com>
> Cc: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<dab53f2f0904010827x2c3eafc7vcfd5701909ec9c1c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Gary--this looks great! One small suggestion: could we bring the logo
> down in scale to ca. 75%? That would look better...
>
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1 Apr 2009, at 05:52, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>>  Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31 Mar 2009, at 22:40, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009, at 14:59, Sean DALY wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I really like this idea, "baseline" so first-time visitors won't get
>>>>>> lost between site sections
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian, would it be possible for you to put together that 1 page
>>>>>> linking to the different sections + Google?
>>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW: Assuming it's not being worked on yet, I just picked this ticket
>>>>> up. Will post a screen grab to the list tomorrow for quick review/
>>>>> feedback cycle.
>>>>>
>>>> Here's a quick first pass at a simple static page, please do fire off
>>>>  some feedback - FWIW, I'm not too keen on how the Google treatment
>>>> clashes
>>>> with SL logo, but it is a useful feature to have on a home page:
>>>>
>>>> http://dev.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/645/simple_static_page_v1.png
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --Gary
>>>>
>>>>> --Gary
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do we need the google logo for trademark reasons? Otherwise I would just
>>> leave it out. It says 'Google' on the button already.
>>>
>>
>> Should I just drop it all together for now? I know we are used to seeing
>> it
>> on the default OLPC XO home page, but it's not like we thought it
>> necessary
>> to put Google search on www.sugarlabes.org
>>
>>  Would be nice to have a link to our bug tracker as well - maybe just
>> named
>>> 'Bugs'.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, here it is with the extra link and dropping the Google logo (but
>> keeping the Google search inputs):
>>
>>
>> http://dev.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/645/simple_static_page_v2.png
>>
>>  Of course - ideally this page would be translated :/ We can do that for
>>> 0.86 then I guess :)
>>>
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> --Gary
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>>  Simon
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> anything at christianmarcschmidt.com
>
> http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com
>
> 917/ 575 0013
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090401/ad5c9b06/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:33:06 +0200
> From: Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0.2212
> To: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Cc: OLPC Etoys <etoys at lists.laptop.org>
> Message-ID: <575DAF2C-FB4F-4927-82B3-6E3FA1E33B4B at freudenbergs.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> == Sources ==
>
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/etoys/etoys-4.0.2212.tar.gz
>
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Etoys/Etoys-101.tar.gz
>
> == Packaged ==
>
> http://etoys.laptop.org/rpms/etoys-4.0.2212-1.noarch.rpm
>
> http://etoys.laptop.org/rpms/Etoys-101.xo
>
> == News ==
>
> * keep temp names in textual scripts
> * make it less easy to rip a BookMorph's nav-bar out of the book
> * fix GStreamer playback (for squeak-vm with GStreamer-Plugin JMM.16)
>
> - Bert (for the Etoys team) -
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:37:42 +0200
> From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Server-devel] Gadget on XS
> To: Guillaume Desmottes <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: server-devel at lists.laptop.org, Sugar-dev
> 	<Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Message-ID: <20090401153742.GW30069 at jones.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
>>>>Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 ? 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a ?crit :
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >The Debian package write logs to /var/log/gadget.log iirc;
>>>
>>>>> What Debian package? Gadget does not seem to be in Debian Sid. I'd
>>>>> be happy to help maintain it officially for Debian if there is
>>>>> already a Gadget package floating around unofficially.
>>>>
>>>>See http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/log/?h=debian
>>>
>>> Above URL does not clarify if it is in Debian officially.
>>>
>>> If my questions are too silly to respond to with human words (as
>>> opposed to just URLs), then I shall not bother you anymore with them.
>>
>>Please try to stay polite.
>
> Hi Guillaume (and everyone else),
>
> Sorry for being rude.
>
> You mention a Debian package, and I wonder:
>
>   1. Is it a Debian package of Gadget, ejabberd or something else?
>
>   2. If it is a Gadget package, is it targeted for Debian officially?
>
>   3. If yes, are you interested in help maintaining such package?
>
>   4. If no, are you interested in helping maintain it officially?
>
>
> Your brief response above seems to indicate that indeed it is a Gadget
> package.
>
> I am still interested in clarification about questions 2, 3 and 4.
>
> If you answer with a URL, then I would appreciate that you also write
> some human words too, as I believe (contrary to David, possibly) that it
> can help avoid misunderstandings.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>   - Jonas
>
> - --
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>   [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAknTikYACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiXQQCeIq5D8lwGeCTwC7vhHZaEFSiE
> HwgAnAuQW10B4V6gas5U9gS5X3l/INUU
> =hpQl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:49:33 +0100
> From: Guillaume Desmottes <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Server-devel] Gadget on XS
> To: server-devel at lists.laptop.org, Sugar-dev
> 	<Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Message-ID: <1238600973.5581.7.camel at cass-lpt>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 ? 17:37 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a ?crit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> >On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
>> >>>Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 ? 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a ?crit :
>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> >The Debian package write logs to /var/log/gadget.log iirc;
>> >>
>> >>>> What Debian package? Gadget does not seem to be in Debian Sid. I'd
>> >>>> be happy to help maintain it officially for Debian if there is
>> >>>> already a Gadget package floating around unofficially.
>> >>>
>> >>>See http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/log/?h=debian
>> >>
>> >> Above URL does not clarify if it is in Debian officially.
>> >>
>> >> If my questions are too silly to respond to with human words (as
>> >> opposed to just URLs), then I shall not bother you anymore with them.
>> >
>> >Please try to stay polite.
>>
>> Hi Guillaume (and everyone else),
>
> Hi
>
> (CCing Daf who is the author of this Debian package).
>
>> Sorry for being rude.
>>
>> You mention a Debian package, and I wonder:
>>
>>   1. Is it a Debian package of Gadget, ejabberd or something else?
>
> The link I pasted you is a git branch of Gadget containing a 'debian'
> directory used for the packaging.
> These files are
> http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/tree/debian?h=debian
>
>
>>   2. If it is a Gadget package, is it targeted for Debian officially?
>
> It could but has not been proposed to Debian yet.
>
>>   3. If yes, are you interested in help maintaining such package?
>>
>>   4. If no, are you interested in helping maintain it officially?
>
> Sure. Any help is welcome.
>
>> Your brief response above seems to indicate that indeed it is a Gadget
>> package.
>>
>> I am still interested in clarification about questions 2, 3 and 4.
>>
>> If you answer with a URL, then I would appreciate that you also write
>> some human words too, as I believe (contrary to David, possibly) that it
>> can help avoid misunderstandings.
>
> Sorry, I was quite busy when I replied to your mail.
>
> Hope it's clearer now.
>
>
> 	G.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> End of Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 6, Issue 6
> *****************************************
>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list