[Sugar-devel] [Server-devel] Gadget on XS

[Guillaume Desmottes]

Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 17:37 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
> >>>Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >The Debian package write logs to /var/log/gadget.log iirc;
> >>
> >>>> What Debian package? Gadget does not seem to be in Debian Sid. I'd 
> >>>> be happy to help maintain it officially for Debian if there is 
> >>>> already a Gadget package floating around unofficially.
> >>>
> >>>See http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/log/?h=debian
> >>
> >> Above URL does not clarify if it is in Debian officially.
> >>
> >> If my questions are too silly to respond to with human words (as 
> >> opposed to just URLs), then I shall not bother you anymore with them.
> >
> >Please try to stay polite.
> 
> Hi Guillaume (and everyone else),

Hi

(CCing Daf who is the author of this Debian package).

> Sorry for being rude.
> 
> You mention a Debian package, and I wonder:
> 
>   1. Is it a Debian package of Gadget, ejabberd or something else?

The link I pasted you is a git branch of Gadget containing a 'debian'
directory used for the packaging.
These files are
http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/tree/debian?h=debian


>   2. If it is a Gadget package, is it targeted for Debian officially?

It could but has not been proposed to Debian yet.

>   3. If yes, are you interested in help maintaining such package?
> 
>   4. If no, are you interested in helping maintain it officially?

Sure. Any help is welcome.

> Your brief response above seems to indicate that indeed it is a Gadget 
> package.
> 
> I am still interested in clarification about questions 2, 3 and 4.
> 
> If you answer with a URL, then I would appreciate that you also write 
> some human words too, as I believe (contrary to David, possibly) that it 
> can help avoid misunderstandings.

Sorry, I was quite busy when I replied to your mail.

Hope it's clearer now.


	G.