[sugar] Which to translate: Gulcose82 or Gulcose

[Sayamindu Dasgupta]

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<mpgritti at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That sounds good to me.
>>   More specifically,  Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk.
>>   It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I
>> can't commit to trunk - #8588)
>>   Another example is pippy;  it hasn't had even branch.
>>
>>   I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here.
>>   If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific
>> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up
>> with it.
>
> I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not.
>
> If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed.
> If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we
> will get them fixed up (one way or another).
>
> For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle
> should just point to master for 0.82...
>
> Sayamindu, does that make sense to you?

 Yeah, it does make sense. In fact that's what we do right now.
However, there can be git conflicts, so I would _highly recommend_
branching :-)
-sdg-



-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]