[sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Persistent activity storage

Yamandu Ploskonka yamaplos
Mon Oct 20 18:38:28 EDT 2008

One indication that I am hanging around with the right kind of people is 
that at least 80% of my new, brilliant ideas turn out to have been 
already though by someone else, in many cases someone I already have the 
email address of.  And the remainder are often actually welcome by that 
crowd, and not just dismissed as the result of early exposure to mercury.

Thanks, y'all!

Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Am 20.10.2008 um 21:35 schrieb Michael Stone:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:25:40PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>> Am 20.10.2008 um 21:12 schrieb Michael Stone:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
>>>>> It would be way nice it also came back to the same page, if you are
>>>>> reading a book
>>>> Yes, that's also a goal, though it will certainly require activity- 
>>>> level
>>>> changes.
>>> Err - hasn't that been a requirement from the beginning? I thought 
>>> that any activity not storing its full state and thus not resuming 
>>> to the exact same state was violating the system rules.
>> Correct.
>> Michael
>> (Perhaps you are suggesting that all current activity implementations
>> conform to this requirement?)
> No, but they should :) The conversation above just made it sound like 
> it was a new idea.
> - Bert -

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list