[sugar] Module proposal: hulahop

Marco Pesenti Gritti mpgritti
Tue Oct 7 08:09:43 EDT 2008


On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
> I guess the alternative of refactoring the desired functionality out
> of Browse into a new module is seen as too cumbersome for our limited
> resources?

Hmmm one option would be to keep hulahop generic (it's not fully
generic even right now, but we can keep it in mind as an ideal goal..)
and add higher level functionality to sugar-toolkit. (sugar.web?)

What do you think? It doesn't sound bad to me. The fact that we are
getting xulrunner+hulahop in Fedora and other distributions might
attract users.

Marco



More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list