[sugar] OLPC's bizarre behaviors
Thu May 22 17:43:21 EDT 2008
In total agreement, etc, here my 2 ?
To avoid a "plus ?a change, plus c'est la m?me chose*" kind of moment,
could we have the naming of such an ombudsman be an open affair, not
something done behind doors?
To begin with, could we pinpoint _what_ we are looking in such a person?
1.- obsessive openness, not subject to OLPC NDA
2.- reasonable knowledge of OLPC, known by and knows the actors / goings on
3.- (please add on, edit, maybe wiki this thing?) .....
*(more of the same)
Paul Fox wrote:
> c. scott ananian wrote:
> > On 5/22/08, Todd Cranston-Cuebas <geekhunter at gmail.com> wrote:
> i think your earlier proposal for establishing a liaison/ambassador
> role was spot on -- that role of evangelism and outreach was
> missing throughout G1G1, and is still missing today
More information about the Sugar-devel