[sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

[Marco Pesenti Gritti]

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Sort of.  Mostly, I'm not sure I understand your intended release
> timeline, so I didn't want to touch it.
>
> I think s/Sugar/Sucrose/ is probably a good choice here.  However, I also
> view a Sucrose release as little more than a pair of pointers, to a
> specific version of Glucose and a specific version of Fructose.  So for
> example, declaring a "feature freeze" on Sucrose seems slightly weird,
> because Sucrose doesn't really have any features of its own.  This is not
> an important point, but since I was not 100% sure what to do, I did nothing.

For 0.82, I'm planning to use a single schedule for Glucose/Fructose
for simplicity (we can reevalute for the next release). So I think
using Fructose on the schedule make sense. I went ahead and made the
change.

Marco