[sugar] A few thoughts on SugarLabs
Fri May 16 22:06:23 EDT 2008
Same feeling here.
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> This is exactly what I think about it. Thanks so much for writing it
> down so clearly.
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Michael Stone <michael at laptop.org> wrote:
>> Recently, I've encountered several people who seem to be looking for
>> perspective on the relationship between OLPC and SugarLabs. I'd like
>> to offer a few thoughts for them to chew on:
>> 1. Sugar is good enough to be interesting to lots of people in the
>> world, in particular, people who don't have XOs.
>> 2. In order to reach more people, Sugar needs to be "natively
>> accessible", e.g. by being packaged for their favorite
>> distributions (and operating systems, as we start looking at the
>> larger world).
>> 3. We would like more contributions; even if some of them do not fit
>> with the user experience we want to provide on the XO. SugarLabs is
>> a fine place to capture many kinds of contributions.
>> 4. Finally, insofar as OLPC and its partners continue to pay the
>> salaries of Sugar developers, supply useful infrastructure, and
>> represent the largest chunk of the Sugar install base, OLPC and
>> its partners will continue to have a lot of say in the development
>> of Sugar.
>> Sugar mailing list
>> Sugar at lists.laptop.org
> Sugar mailing list
> Sugar at lists.laptop.org
_| X | Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\|_O_| "It's an education project, not a laptop project!"
More information about the Sugar-devel