[sugar] Release schedule and process
Mikus Grinbergs
mikus
Tue May 13 18:38:02 EDT 2008
Walter wrote:
>> I think we need to decouple the release cycles between activities and
>> Sugar to whatever degree possible. Activities should be able to change
>> at whatever pace is dictated by the activity developers. Since
>> activities depend upon Sugar, the Sugar schedule needs to be more
>> predictable. The only time it seems there would be a conflict is when
>> an incompatible change in a Sugar module is made
Yep. When the decision was made to not deliver built-in activities
within the laptop.org builds, Activities development was decoupled
from Sugar (except as noted above).
Regarding the "schedule" for the 'release' of Activities: I believe
there are three populations of Activity-users to be kept in mind:
1) Users who will not upgrade their Activities except under the
direction of whoever they got their OLPCs from. [I presume this is
what the "automatic_upgrade" (e.g., 'security/update-stream') was
designed for. How Activities are submitted (including timeline
determination) to this facility needs to be documented.]
(2) Users who don't want to wait for an "automatic_upgrade", but who
would only accept __certified__ Activities. [I presume that when
enough "significant" new/changed Activities have been tested by a
responsible organization, that organization will create a newer
version of an "activity package", and make that package available on
a server. This can be need-driven, instead of time-driven.]
(3) Users who would like to independently install Activities, even
when such Activities have not undergone "official" QA. [I presume
that a "master list" of the latest and greatest Activities will be
kept by a responsible organization. Activities ought to be listed
as soon as the individual developer says so.]
--------
If "doesn't run" situations are to be avoided, something like a
"package manager" will have to be provided AT EACH XO (to perform
the *actual* Activity installation). It will check the system for
pre-requisites as indicated by each Activity, and will alert the
user when an install is attempted whose pre-requisites are not met.
mikus
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list