[sugar] review: Guillaume's 'activity' branch of Gadget
Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmottes
Wed Jun 11 06:04:53 EDT 2008
Le mardi 10 juin 2008 ? 14:42 +0100, Dafydd Harries a ?crit :
> > diff --git a/gadget/component.py b/gadget/component.py
> > index b5fc702..dd85a03 100644
> > --- a/gadget/component.py
> > +++ b/gadget/component.py
> > @@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ class Room(object):
> > def __init__(self, own_nick):
> > self.own_nick = own_nick
> > self.membership = None
> > - self.members = {}
> > + self.members = set()
> > self.properties = {}
> > + self.id = None
> >
>
> Would it be possible to just have a Room.activity property and use that to
> store members/id?
>
I'll remove the Room object and move membership management to Activity
as we discussed yesterday.
> > class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > debug = False
> > @@ -333,7 +334,7 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > def message(self, stanza):
> > type = stanza.getAttribute('type', 'normal')
> >
> > - if type in ('chat', 'groupchat'):
> > + if type in ('chat'):
> > return
>
> This doesn't do quite what you want. "()" doesn't create a tuple, "," does, so
> this is the same as "type in 'chat'", which will be true if type is a
> substring of "chat". Better to just say "==".
>
Right. Forgot about that, good catch. Fixed.
> >
> > if type == 'normal':
> > @@ -343,12 +344,17 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > return
> > elif (elem.uri == ns.ACTIVITY_PROP and
> > elem.name == 'properties'):
> > - self.message_activity_properties(stanza, elem)
> > + self.message_pre_invite_activity_properties(stanza, elem)
> > return
> > elif elem.uri == ns.PUBSUB_EVENT and elem.name == 'event':
> > self.message_pubsub_notification(stanza, elem)
> > return
> >
> > + elif type == 'groupchat':
> > + for elem in stanza.elements():
> > + if elem.uri == ns.ACTIVITY_PROP and elem.name == 'properties':
> > + self.message_activity_properties(stanza, elem)
>
> You should return here. Perhaps we should dispatch messages more like we
> dispatch IQs, i.e. using a dict.
>
fixed. I added a FIXME suggestion a better dispatch system.
> > +
> > # FIXME: handle close query stanza
> > log.msg('got unhandled <message>')
> >
> > @@ -357,7 +363,7 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > if elem.uri == ns.MUC_USER and elem.name == 'invite':
> > self.message_muc_invite(stanza, elem)
> >
> > - def create_room(self, jid, properties):
> > + def create_room(self, jid, properties, id):
>
> Hmm, can we put the id before the properties? I think it's more aesthetically
> pleasing that way.
>
done.
> > if jid in self.mucs:
> > # We already have a room by this name.
> > return
> > @@ -366,9 +372,10 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > # join it.
> > room = Room('inspector')
> > room.properties = properties
> > + room.id = id
> > self.mucs[jid] = room
> >
> > - def message_activity_properties(self, stanza, properties_elem):
> > + def message_pre_invite_activity_properties(self, stanza, properties_elem):
> > # XXX Restrictions on from address?
> >
> > try:
> > @@ -384,7 +391,7 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > if not (properties and activity and room_jid):
> > return
> >
> > - self.create_room(room_jid, properties)
> > + self.create_room(room_jid, properties, activity)
>
> Perhaps we should rename 'activity' to 'activity_id' for clarity.
>
done.
> > def message_muc_invite(self, stanza, invite):
> > to = stanza.getAttribute('to')
> > @@ -502,17 +509,54 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > # Presence for our in-room self; we've finished joining the
> > # room.
> > room.membership = 'joined'
> > +
> > + # activities are created and added to the model when the
> > + # inspector actually joined the muc.
>
> English nitpicks: Your tenses don't agree here. "are created" ... "joined".
> s/joined/join/. If you use a full stop, you should also capitalise the first
> letter.
>
fixed.
> > + # If we'll do it before, we won't be able to properly track
> > + # activity's properties and members.
>
> I don't understand this comment.
>
Humm me neither actually :) Removed.
> > + activity = self.model.activity_add(room.id, room_jid,
> > + room.properties)
> > +
> > + # Activity and Room now share the same set() object
> > + activity.members = room.members
> > return
> >
> > + item = xpath_query('/presence/x[@xmlns="%s"]/item' % ns.MUC_USER,
> > + stanza)
> > + if not item or item[0].getAttribute('jid') is None:
> > + log.msg("full jid of %s missing. Can't update activity members"
> > + % jid.resource)
>
> English nitpicks: you should capitalise "full" and have a full stop after
> the second sentence.
>
fixed.
> > + return
> > +
> > + full_jid = JID(item[0]['jid']).userhost()
>
> Hmm, "full_jid" seems like a bad name, since it implies a JID with a resource.
> Perhaps it should be "real_jid" or just "jid".
>
renamed to real_jid
> > +
> > + activities = self.model.activity_by_room(room_jid)
> > +
> > if type is None:
> > log.msg('room %s has member %s' % (room_jid, jid.resource))
> > - room.members[jid.resource] = True
> > + room.members.add(full_jid)
> > +
> > elif type == 'unavailable':
> > if room_jid in self.mucs:
> > room = self.mucs[room_jid]
> >
> > - if jid.resource in room.members:
> > - del room.members[jid.resource]
> > + if full_jid in room.members:
> > + room.members.remove(full_jid)
> > +
> > + if len(room.members) == 0:
> > + self.leave_activity(room_jid, room.id)
> > +
> > + def leave_activity(self, room_jid, activity_id):
>
> If we have Room.activity you won't need to pass around the ID here.
> > + log.msg('leave room %s' % room_jid)
> > +
>
> Should be "leaving room".
>
fixed.
> > + presence = domish.Element((None, 'presence'))
> > + presence['to'] = '%s/inspector' % room_jid
>
> You should use the JID class to generate the JID, and use Room.own_nick for
> the resource.
>
done.
> > + presence['type'] = 'unavailable'
> > + x = presence.addElement((ns.MUC_USER, 'x'))
> > + self.send(presence)
> > +
> > + self.model.activity_remove(activity_id)
> > + del self.mucs[room_jid]
> >
> > def message_pubsub_notification(self, stanza, event):
> > items = event.firstChildElement()
> > @@ -533,3 +577,33 @@ class GadgetService(component.Service):
> > self.model.buddy_add(jid, props)
> >
> > # FIXME: send notification messages to interested buddies
> > +
> > + def message_activity_properties(self, stanza, properties_elem):
> > + id = properties_elem.getAttribute('activity')
> > + room_jid = properties_elem.getAttribute('room')
> > + jid = JID(stanza['from'])
> > +
> > + if room_jid != jid.userhost():
> > + log.msg("Ignored activity properties message from %s trying to change properties for another room"
> > + % stanza['from'])
>
> Can you wrap this to 79 characters? You can just split the string literal in
> two.
>
done.
> > + return
> > +
> > + try:
> > + properties = parse_properties(properties_elem)
> > + except PropertyTypeError:
> > + log.msg("Ignored activity properties message from %s containing an invalid property"
> > + % stanza['from'])
>
> Same here.
>
done.
> > + return
> > +
> > + if not self.model.has_activity(id):
> > + log.msg("Ignored activity properties message from %s about an invalid activity: %s "
> > + % stanza['from'], id)
>
> And here.
>
done.
> > + return
> > +
> > + # is activity private?
> > + if properties.get('private') in (('bool', '1'), ('bool', 'true')):
>
> Perhaps we should do some kind of normalisation in parse_properties, and maybe
> ignore malformed values.
>
We already check this:
if type == 'bool' and value not in ['1', '0', 'true', 'false']:
raise PropertyTypeError(type, elems.uri)
Do you think we should check that the 'private' properties is always of
type 'bool'?
> > + log.msg('Activity %s is not private. Leave it' % id)
>
> s/Leave/Leaving/.
>
fixed.
> > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ class RoomMembershipTest(TestCase):
> > self.done = defer.Deferred()
> > self.server.addOnetimeObserver('//presence', self.presence)
> > # Simulate invitation process.
> > - self.service.create_room('chat at conf.foo.org', {})
> > + self.service.create_room('chat at conf.foo.org', {}, 'activity1')
> > self.service.invited('inspector at gadget.bar.org', 'chat at conf.foo.org')
> > return self.done
> >
> > @@ -222,11 +222,15 @@ class RoomMembershipTest(TestCase):
> > presence = domish.Element((ns.CLIENT, 'presence'))
> > presence['from'] = 'chat at conf.foo.org/amy'
> > x = presence.addElement((ns.MUC_USER, 'x'))
> > + item = x.addElement('item')
> > + item['jid'] = 'amy at foo.org/resource'
> > self.server.send(presence)
> >
> > presence = domish.Element((ns.CLIENT, 'presence'))
> > presence['from'] = 'chat at conf.foo.org/bob'
> > x = presence.addElement((ns.MUC_USER, 'x'))
> > + item = x.addElement('item')
> > + item['jid'] = 'bob at foo.org/resource'
> > self.server.send(presence)
>
> We should probably have a test that includes a MUC presence message without a
> jid.
Good idea. Added.
> Perhaps we should factor out the code for creating MUC presence messages here.
done. I created a send_muc_presence method in TestCase as lot of tests need it.
I fixed all the typo in tests.
Thanks for the review,
G.
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list