[sugar] journal object transfer for 8.2
Michael Stone
michael
Mon Jun 9 16:57:58 EDT 2008
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
> robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
> from the Journal is seemingly a high priority.
My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the
network, the feature will function poorly, if at all. Consequently, I
would rather see bug-fixes which will bring the system closer to its
intended operation with high probability. However, this is just a
personal preference. I'm (mostly) happy to release whatever you send my
way, so long as it fixes more problems than it creates.
> Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not
> really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be
> particularly pressing.
Perhaps a few hours of triage are called for? Here are a few of my
favorites:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7011 <--- Zoom buttons should cycle
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7220 <--- Populate activity ring
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4236 <--- Cancel activity startup
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7020 <--- Force activity shutdown
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6895 <--- Access point UI
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6909
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5444 <--- Robustness to failure
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6148 <--- Non-ASCII Activity Names
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6471 <--- Activity startup times
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6472
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6237 <--- Cloaked APs
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6281 <--- 802.1x for NY,UY!
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4877 <--- Session API
Michael
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list