[sugar] Drop activity launch limitation?
Mon Jul 14 05:35:16 EDT 2008
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eben Eliason <eben.eliason at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'm unsatisfied, too. Perhaps we can shorten the interval, but
> better than that we should be actively attempting to detect failure
> (how can we do this?) so that when a launch fails "hard" for some
> reason, we can immediately indicate that.
I think that many (most?) windows have a property that indicates the
pid of the owner process. Perhaps we could check for those windows
every X seconds during launch if that process still exists?
More information about the Sugar-devel