[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs web services conventions

[Bernie Innocenti]

David Farning wrote:
> Over the last couple of weeks Sugar Labs has brought several web
> services online.
> 
> What would be a good naming convention for the git repositories for
> these services?  I have been using SERVICENAME.sugarlabs.org.  Now, I
> think that sl.o-SERVICENAME makes more sense.  It is easier to search
> for web service related repositories that way.  Any thoughts before I
> start making the changes.

+1 for me, but... the "." in the middle of the name is a bit confusing
and maybe even disallowed as a UNIX name in gitorious and such.

How about slo-SERVICENAME?


> PS. If you get a chance, thank Bernie and the rest of the
> Infrastructure Team.  Sunjammer gives Sugar Labs a lot of fexability
> to set-up, test, and put new services into productions!

Thank the FSF admins, not me!  They did all the grunt work for us and
will soon buy more RAM and relocate the server while I'm enjoying
holidays in NYC and Washington!

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://www.sugarlabs.org/