[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Request for help packaging activities for Sugar on a Stick
Aleksey Lim
alsroot at member.fsf.org
Tue Dec 23 23:57:10 EST 2008
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 04:53:15AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> wrote:
> > > I don't suggest waiting for activities to be packaged, and no porting
> > > should be required: can't you just preinstall a bunch of .xo files?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > we are not going to block on it. The plan is to continue to package
> > activities and hopefully to do it faster. And at the same time to make
> > .xo work better on SoaS (also I need to figure out how to best install
> > .xo from the livecd kickstart, it's pretty painful). Then I'm looking
> > forward for a good discussion at FUDcon about .xo and normal
> > distribution packaging.
> >
> > That said, unfortunately, the hardest problems are in the system
> > differences between Fedora and the OLPC images (sugar-evince, csound,
> > olpcgames problems, tamtam performance hacks, xulrunner patches etc).
> >
> > Marco
>
> is there any public discussion (especially after founding SL and targeting to
> another distros) about packaging sugar activities, maybe using something like
> autopackage or openpkg fits better then .xo ?
>
particularly in case of activities.s.o
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list