[Sugar-devel] Bundling plugins with Browse
dr at jones.dk
Mon Dec 8 14:49:27 EST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>I haven't done these tricks myself, but I know that some activities
>>>ship executables and libraries inside their bundles.
>>>Two places to look at are modifying PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH and
>>>insert in them paths inside the bundle.
>> Please make such hacks optional, to ease integration with
>> distributions, that often mandate the use of shared libraries.
>Sure, the idea here is to be able to fix a bug in the OLPC distro
>without having to respin images.
>Distros shouldn't resort to these hacks ever, but deployers may find it
>handy in some cases.
Is this not about writing an add-on to the Browse activity, providing a
new functionality: embedded PDF viewer?
If so, then why do that as a "dirty hack"? I see a use for such add-on
more widely than just by the OLPC distro.
Sorry if I (still) misunderstand the issue here.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel