[Sugar-devel] Add Fedora logo to Sugar

[Ed McNierney]

Tomeu -

Hi - thanks for bringing this up.  Trac #8767 covers OLPC's agreement with
Red Hat regarding the identification of OLPC's XO bundled software.  The
proposed identifications are to provide boot-time "Fedora remix" graphics on
the XO.  It says nothing one way or the other about non-OLPC Sugar
distributions that may or may not contain packages derived from Fedora.
This ticket is specific to the XO; other Sugar distributions should decide
what their preferences and requirements are for various logo/brand
identification.  Presumably those requirements might vary from one
distribution to another.

I hope this helps - please let me know if there are more questions about
this specific Trac ticket.  Thanks!

    - Ed


On 12/6/08 8:34 AM, "Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu at sugarlabs.org> wrote:

> From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Eben#Tasks:
> 
> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
> We've agreed to include the Fedora logo in our Sugar distributions.
> (Is this an OLPC agreement, or something SugarLabs should be doing in
> general?) I've added some thoughts to the ticket (Trac #8767) , but
> I'd like to get some more feedback and finalize a plan so this doesn't
> become a last-minute problem.
> 
> ~~~
> 
> SugarLabs wants to help distributions ship Sugar but isn't in the
> distribution business itself. Distributions are free to take the code
> we release and modify it at will to better suit their interests. Now,
> if distros want to be able to incorporate their brands in the Sugar UI
> and would prefer not to have to apply their own patches to every
> release, we could devise some way for distros to brand their Sugars
> without patching code.
> 
> Distro people: what would you like to do regarding branding?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomeu
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel