[Sugar-devel] Activityfactory: rename activity_id to instance_id
Eben Eliason
eben.eliason at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 13:13:04 EST 2008
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> I had a brief chat with marco on IRC about activity_id. This is stored in
> the datastore, unpacked to activityhandle data structure, and used to
> identify an instance in a way that persists across resumes. I think
> instance_id is a much better name for such a thing, and would be willing to
> make the patch (basically just a global search-and-replace).
>
> Marco says that the this is part of a larger mess, and so he seemed more
> interested in redesign than in such small tinkering. I think that it's not
> an either/or choice: tinkering helps redesign, it doesn't get in the way. He
> suggested I discuss it on the ML, so here I am. The other possible issue is
> if this is API which is used by any activities: I really think not, and I'll
> do my best to check, but if you know of anything please say so.
>
> If you want to use this thread to talk about the larger issues, please do,
> it is an important discussion. But don't forget to opine on whether I should
> do this one little patch.
+1 from me. The word "activity" is already too tangled up in various
ways. I think this distinction makes it clearer.
- Eben
> Jameson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list