[sugar] [PATCH] sugar pylint (vol2)
Martin Dengler
martin
Tue Apr 22 09:24:47 EDT 2008
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > Another issue I have quite often is the one of unused variables due
> > to returned tuples and lists where not all the variables are used in
> > the code.
> > What about doing here, or any other options?
>
> IMHO, pylint shouldn't warn about these situations. The code it's
> complaining about is a lot nicer than the "pylint approved"
> alternative you mention.
Evidently one other solution is to adopt a naming convention for the
unused variables in a tuple-unpacking LHS and add that as a pylint
rule:
http://lists.logilab.org/pipermail/python-projects/2006-November/001059.html
> > Best,
> > Simon
>
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/attachments/20080422/60bc5599/attachment.pgp
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list