[sugar] Identifying Activities?

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu
Mon Apr 7 10:02:59 EDT 2008


Hi,

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Michael Stone <michael at laptop.org> wrote:
>  I saw some patches fly by suggesting that you want to identify
>  activities by bundle-id and version number rather than simply by
>  bundle-id. What is the purpose of making this change?

We need to have multiple versions of a bundle installed at the same
time, so the bundle_id no longer suffices to refer to a bundle.

Chema (homunq) has been thinking about signed bundles as part of his
work on Develop, so maybe we could discuss all this now and reach an
agreement on how we want to refer to "executable" activities, be
installed, in the network or in development.

Thanks,

Tomeu



More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list