[sugar] Identifying Activities?
Mon Apr 7 10:02:59 EDT 2008
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Michael Stone <michael at laptop.org> wrote:
> I saw some patches fly by suggesting that you want to identify
> activities by bundle-id and version number rather than simply by
> bundle-id. What is the purpose of making this change?
We need to have multiple versions of a bundle installed at the same
time, so the bundle_id no longer suffices to refer to a bundle.
Chema (homunq) has been thinking about signed bundles as part of his
work on Develop, so maybe we could discuss all this now and reach an
agreement on how we want to refer to "executable" activities, be
installed, in the network or in development.
More information about the Sugar-devel