[sugar] #1560 NORM Trial-2: Activity launch not detected
Bert Freudenberg
bert
Mon Jun 4 09:30:44 EDT 2007
On Jun 3, 2007, at 18:01 , Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
> #1560: Activity launch not detected
> ---------------------
> +------------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: bert | Owner: dcbw
> Type: defect | Status: reopened
> Priority: normal | Milestone: Trial-2
> Component: sugar | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords:
> Verified: 0 |
> ---------------------
> +------------------------------------------------------
> Comment (by marco):
>
> This should be fixed again in the latest git. Activity id and
> bundle id
> should now be provided by two properties of the toplevel X window.
>
> _SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ID (utf8 string)
> _SUGAR_BUNDLE_ID (utf8 string)
>
> sugar/lib/sugar-x11-util.c has the code which we use to set those
> properties for python activities.
This only complicates matters. Not only for Etoys (which does not
have a way to set X properties currently), but I see you had to
resort to C code even for Python activities. I'd much prefer if the
only thing Sugar cares about an activity X-wise is its window ID (and
we're working on a way to make that accessible in Squeak). Everything
else should be handled by DBus, and this is how it actually was
before your refactoring. If anything I'd shift communication
*towards" DBus, not away from it towards X by introducing arbitrary
and unnecessary properties.
Besides, it does not address the original problem - that if an
activity X window is opened and detected by the Sugar shell, but it
has not created its DBus service yet, the shell will mistake it for a
raw X app (creating a
"raw" icon in the donut next to the still flashing activity icon).
This can easily be fixed up later by detecting the DBus service
creation and removing the raw icon - this is how my fix worked.
I do like the cleanup you did to the home model code, but please, can
we do away with the properties?
- Bert -
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list