[sugar] Initial Security Patches
Marco Pesenti Gritti
mpgritti
Tue Jul 31 18:44:32 EDT 2007
On 7/31/07, Noah Kantrowitz <kantrn at rpi.edu> wrote:
> Our rough idea was to say unsigned activities can't talk to each
> other. signed<->* and sugar<->* would still be allowed though. Should
> be enough to stop the most flagrant issues, while still allowing
> interesting uses of DBus.
The problem is that to be able to use DBus that way you really want
DBus activation...
Marco
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list