[sugar] User Identification
Jim Fallgatter
jim
Wed Feb 7 18:30:32 EST 2007
I should have been more clear...however the resource sensitivity issue is very interesting too.
What I was really thinking about was a way to facilitate the desire to offer and account for services given free to the children that would normally be charged for. Carrying that thought further ...in the USA...with some legal work these donations could perhaps even be tax deductible...potentially unleashing many benefits. Jim ============================================================
From: Ivan Krsti? <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu>
Date: 2007/02/07 Wed PM 03:02:36 PST
To: "John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp at redhat.com>
CC: Jim at Aqwertian.com, sugar at laptop.org, Simson Garfinkel <simsong at acm.org>
Subject: Re: [sugar] User Identification
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> I think this is a different issue than what Jim is asking. He is asking
> if we are going to have something in the UserAgent string which
> identifies this as an OLPC machine
As a knee-jerk reaction, identifying OLPC machines through the
User-Agent header makes me nervous. I'll have to think it through, but
I'm against it for now.
--
Ivan Krsti?? <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | GPG: 0x147C722D
============================================================
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list