[sugar] Update.1 schedule & trac usage... ***Please Read**

[Marco Pesenti Gritti]

On Dec 28, 2007 4:14 PM, Jim Gettys <jg at laptop.org> wrote:
> I guess there may have been misunderstanding: since the beginning of
> December (or maybe before), only things intended for Update.1 and issues
> approved for fixing in Update.1 needing testing were supposed to be
> loaded into joyride.  As such, there should be no cherry picking of
> fixes needed, when you are at a completed state.

I don't mean cherry picking of single fixes/git commits, but cherry
picking of packages from joyride to Update.1.

My understanding of the process is:

1 rwh fix bug A in sugar
2 tomeu fix bug B in sugar
3 tomeu builds a sugar package with bug A and bug B fixes in it.
4 the package goes in joyride and tomeu test it out
5 tomeu request ApprovalForUpdate
6 marco or jg approves the package
7 dgilmore tag (in other words cherry pick) the package for Update.1

With this process, if ticket A and ticket B are closed *before* 5, it
will be hard to track which packages needs to be tagged for Update.1
(and likely that we will miss some of them).

Marco